< Más Articulos : Kamalas *What If* for Jews and Israel (Times of Israel - 27 Jul 2025)
-
-
Kamalas *What If* for Jews and Israel (Times of Israel - 27 Jul 2025)
I posed some questions to ChatGPT, Gemini, Deepseek, and Copilot, four of today’s most prominent AI platforms, on a topic I believe holds significant relevance for the Jewish world:
What might have occurred if Kamala Harris had won the U.S. presidential election in 2024?
Note: The responses provided by AI platforms are especially relevant and insightful, as they draw on the analysis of thousands of sources and data points available online related to the topic at hand. Of course, I also added my own opinion—I couldn’t resist.
Question number one: If Kamala Harris had won the U.S. presidential election in 2024, would the United States have attacked Iran’s nuclear reactors to help end the war between Israel and Iran?
ChatGPT Answer:
It is unlikely that the United States under President Kamala Harris would have launched a direct attack on Iran’s nuclear reactors solely to end a war between Israel and Iran, unless Iran posed an immediate and existential threat to U.S. interests or allies.
Gemini Answer:
It is impossible to definitively state what a hypothetical President Kamala Harris would have done regarding Iranian nuclear reactors in 2025 to end a war between Israel and Iran. Her stated positions indicate a strong commitment to preventing Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons, with "all options on the table," while also preferring diplomatic solutions
DeepSeek answer
There is no indication that Kamala Harris, or any U.S. administration, would launch a military strike on Iran's nuclear reactors to end a war between Israel and Iran. The U.S. typically prefers diplomacy, sanctions, and multilateral approaches over direct military action against nuclear facilities. Any decision to attack Iran would involve complex geopolitical considerations, congressional approval, and potential global repercussions. Harris would likely prioritize de-escalation and diplomatic solutions rather than unilateral military strikes.Copilot Answer
If she had won the 2024 U.S. presidential election, it's unlikely she would have unilaterally ordered an attack on Iran’s nuclear reactors to end a war between Israel and Iran. Such a decision would require extensive consultation with military advisors, intelligence agencies, allies, and Congress. Her record suggests she would have prioritized de-escalation, sanctions, and diplomatic pressure over direct military action
My humble human opinionI believe Kamala´s administration would have refrained from bombing the nuclear reactors, leading the war down a different path.
Question number two: Had Kamala Harris won the 2024 U.S. presidential election, would her administration have approached military aid, logistical support, and other defense assistance to Israel differently from the Trump administration?
ChatGPT Answer: Yes, likely. While Harris would have maintained U.S. support for Israel, her administration may have placed greater emphasis on humanitarian concerns, potentially conditioning military aid on adherence to international law—unlike Trump’s more unconditional backing.
Gemini Answer:: Yes, it's highly likely that a Kamala Harris administration would approach military aid, logistical support, and other defense assistance to Israel differently from a Trump administration.Harris' administration would probably: Place a greater emphasis on humanitarian concerns and civilian protection in Gaza; Be more vocal about the need for a two-state solution; Adhere more closely to international law and human rights considerations when evaluating military aid; Re-engage more strongly with the Palestinian Authority and potentially restore aid to Palestinian organizations.
DeepSeek Answer: It's likely her administration would have differed in approach, potentially emphasizing different diplomatic priorities or policies, but specific details are uncertain.
Copilot Answer: Had Kamala Harris won the 2024 U.S. presidential election, her administration would likely have maintained strong military and defense support for Israel, but with greater emphasis on humanitarian concerns and diplomatic pressure than the Trump administration. While Trump backed Israel unconditionally and encouraged aggressive military action, Harris has supported Israel’s right to defend itself while also calling for a ceasefire, expressing concern over civilian suffering in Gaza, and advocating for a two-state solution
My humble human opinion: I believe Kamala's administration would have given in to internal pressure from progressive Democrats opposed to sending arms and military aid to Israel.
Question number three: If Kamala Harris had won the U.S. presidential election in 2024, would her administration have confronted antisemitic movements and incidents as forcefully as the Trump administration did?
ChatGPT Answer: Kamala Harris’s administration would likely have taken antisemitism seriously, but addressed it through a different lens—focusing more on civil rights, education, and institutional reform rather than the forceful rhetoric and symbolic actions often seen under the Trump administration.
Gemini Answer: In essence, a Harris administration would likely employ a more collaborative, comprehensive, and perhaps less confrontational approach than the Trump administration's direct and often punitive measures. However, both would assert the importance of confronting antisemitism.DeepSeek Answer: A Kamala Harris administration would likely have condemned antisemitism strongly, aligning with Democratic Party values of combating hate speech and discrimination. However, her approach might have focused more on law enforcement, education, and coalition-building rather than the Trump administration's more aggressive rhetoric and executive actions. The response would have been forceful but possibly less confrontational in tone.
Copilot Answer: Kamala Harris’s administration would likely have taken a firm but more nuanced approach to confronting antisemitism than the Trump administration. While she consistently condemned antisemitism and supported Israel’s security, she emphasized universal human rights and civil discourse over aggressive enforcement. Her strategy would have focused on education, coalition-building, and protecting free speech, rather than sweeping crackdowns or punitive measures like funding cuts and deportationsMy humble human opinion: I believe Kamala's administration would have been less forceful than the Trump administration in confronting antisemitic movements and incidents, allowing many to persist.
Question number four: Had Kamala Harris won the 2024 U.S. presidential election, would her administration have taken a firm stand against antisemitic officials and institutions internationally, urging them to alter their positions or resign?
ChatGPT Answer: Probably not. While Harris would likely have condemned antisemitism in general terms, her administration may have been less assertive than Trump’s in directly pressuring international officials or institutions to change their stance or resign.
Gemini Answer: Yes, it's highly probable that a Kamala Harris administration would take a firm stand against antisemitic officials and institutions internationally.
While all US administrations generally oppose antisemitism, a Harris administration would likely emphasize a more direct and proactive approach in international diplomacy, aligning with the Democratic Party's stated commitment to human rights and combating various forms of hate
DeepSeek Answer: It's probable her administration would have taken a strong stance against antisemitic officials and institutions, urging changes or resignations, though exact actions would depend on circumstances.
Copilot Answer: If Kamala Harris had won the 2024 U.S. presidential election, her administration would likely have condemned antisemitism globally, but taken a more nuanced and diplomatic approach than the Trump administration. Rather than publicly demanding resignations, Harris tends to frame antisemitism as part of broader struggles against hate and racism, urging reform and dialogue over confrontation
My humble human opinion: I doubt a Kamala Harris administration would have prioritized taking a firm international stand against antisemitic foreign institutions and officials.
My humble human conclusion: Even though some Jews dislike Donald Trump, both the Jewish people and the State of Israel are far better off with him as President of the United States than they would have been under a Kamala Harris administration. And for that, we should be thankful.
(Times of Israel - 27 Jul 2025)
https://blogs.timesofisrael.com/kamalas-what-if-for-jews-and-israel/
( Por: Yehudi Sabbagh , 26/07/2025 )
